Model of Management (Mo.Ma) for the patient with schizophrenia: crisis control, maintenance, relapse prevention, and recovery with long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs)
Modello di Management (Mo.Ma) del paziente affetto da schizofrenia: controllo della crisi, mantenimento, prevenzione delle ricadute e recovery
con gli antipsicotici LAI


1NESMOS Department (Neurosciences, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs), Sapienza University of Rome,
School of Medicine and Psychology; Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
2Faculty of Economics, Centre for Economic and International Studies (CEIS)-Economic Evaluation and HTA (EEHTA),
University of Rome, Italy
3Villa von Siebenthal Neuropsychiatric, Clinic and Hospital Rome, Italy
4ASL VT, Viterbo, Italy
5Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Section of Neuroscience, University of Florence, Italy
6Department of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Palermo, Italy
7DSM ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
8Department of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Fondazione ‘‘P. Alberto Mileno Onlus’’, Vasto (CH), Italy

summary. Schizophrenia is a severe mental disease that affects approximately 1% of the population with a relevant chronic impact on social and occupational functioning and daily activities. People with schizophrenia are 2-2.5 times more likely to die early than the general population. Non-adherence to antipsychotic medications, both in chronic and first episode schizophrenia, is one of the most important risk factors for relapse and hospitalization, that consequently contributes to increased costs due to psychiatric hospitalization. Atypical long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics can improve treatment adherence and decrease re-hospitalization rates in patients with schizophrenia since its onset. The primary goals in the management of schizophrenia are directed not only at symptom reduction in the short and long term, but also at maintaining physical and mental functioning, improving quality of life, and promoting patient recovery. Aim. To propose a scientific evidence-based integrated model that provides an algorithm for recovery of patients with schizophrenia and to investigate the effectiveness and safety of antipsychotics LAI in the treatment, maintenance, relapse prevention, and recovery of schizophrenia. Methods. After an accurate literature review we identified, collected and analyzed the crucial points in taking care schizophrenia patients, through which we defined the steps described in the model of management and the choice of the better treatment option. Results. In the management model we propose, the choice of a second generation long acting antipsychotic, could allow from the earliest stages of illness better patient management, especially for young individuals with schizophrenia onset, a better recovery and significant reductions of relapse and health care costs. LAI formulations of antipsychotics are valuable, because they help patients to remain adherent to their medication through regular contact with healthcare professionals and to prevent covert non-adherence. Conclusion. The proposed schizophrenia model of management could allow better patient management and recovery, in which the treatment with LAI formulation is a safe and effective therapeutic option. This new therapeutic approach could change the cost structure of schizophrenia by decreasing costs with efficient economic resource allocation guaranteed from efficient diagnostic and therapeutic pathways.

KEY WORDS: Long-acting injectable antipsychotic drugs, LAIs, schizophrenia, recovery.

RIASSUNTO. La schizofrenia colpisce circa l’1% della popolazione e rappresenta un grave disturbo mentale con un notevole impatto anche sul funzionamento sociale, lavorativo e sulle attività della vita quotidiana. Le persone con schizofrenia hanno un tasso di mortalità superiore di 2-2,5 rispetto a quello della popolazione generale. La non aderenza ai farmaci antipsicotici è uno dei più importanti fattori di rischio per le ricadute e le ospedalizzazioni, sia nei pazienti con disturbo cronico sia al primo episodio, e conseguentemente contribuisce all’aumento dei costi sanitari. Gli antipsicotici atipici LAI possono migliorare l’aderenza al trattamento contribuendo a diminuire i tassi di ricaduta nei pazienti affetti da schizofrenia fin dall’esordio. Gli obiettivi primari nella gestione dei pazienti schizofrenici sono diretti, non solo alla riduzione dei sintomi nel breve termine, ma anche al mantenimento fisico e della funzionalità mentale, migliorando la qualità della vita e promuovendo il recupero del paziente. Scopo. Proporre un modello integrato, basato sulle evidenze, che fornisca un algoritmo efficace per il recupero del paziente schizofrenico e indagare l’efficacia e la sicurezza degli antipsicotici LAI nel trattamento, nel mantenimento, nella prevenzione delle ricadute e nella recovery dei pazienti affetti da schizofrenia. Metodi. Dopo un’accurata analisi di letteratura abbiamo identificato, raccolto e analizzato gli elementi qualificanti per un’ottimale gestione del paziente schizofrenico, definendo un modello di gestione e selezione delle alternative terapeutiche. Conclusioni. Il modello di gestione della schizofrenia proposto potrebbe consentire un migliore recupero funzionale del paziente grazie alla scelta di iniziare il percorso terapeutico, fin dalle prime fasi del disturbo soprattutto se in giovane età e al primo episodio, con un farmaco atipico LAI. All’interno dei farmaci antipsicotici atipici la formulazione LAI rappresenta una scelta terapeutica sicura ed efficace nella gestione della schizofrenia fin dall’inizio della malattia. Questo nuovo approccio terapeutico potrebbe modificare la struttura dei costi della schizofrenia attraverso la loro riduzione e la ricollocazione delle risorse economiche, che verrà garantita da efficienti algoritmi diagnostico-terapeutici.

PAROLE CHIAVE: Antipsicotici long-acting iniettabili, LAI, schizofrenia, recovery.

Epidemiology of schizophrenia: impact on social and occupational functioning
Schizophrenia is a severe, chronic psychiatric disorder affecting about 1% of the general population1. It is associated with social and occupational functioning decline and characterized by positive symptoms, representing an excess or distortion of normal functions, negative symptoms, a reduction of normal functions, and cognitive symptoms2. Schizophrenia-associated impairment tends to persist in many patients, thus impacting considerably their independent personal, social, and occupational lives and constituting a major source of disability3,4. Cognitive impairment persistently reduces patients’ ability to engage and maintain social and professional relationships4-6. The main reason for unimproved functional outcome is that the treatment of those aspects that are most strongly related to it, i.e., cognitive dysfunction and negative symptoms, is currently unsuccessful7. The best predictor of poor long-term functioning is poor first-three-post-diagnosis-years functioning8. This is most prominent for unemployment, which is associated with duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) and prevalent negative symptoms9. Early intervention in psychosis is a comprehensive and evidence-based approach aimed at detection and treatment of psychotic symptoms in their early stages, so to reduce the long-term adverse impact of psychosis and prevent relapses. It focuses on people with ultra-high risk for psychosis and those with initial psychotic symptoms. Even incompletely recovered patients may achieve a sufficiently satisfactory quality of life, provided they receive adequate support. The switch from an oral to a LAI antipsychotic formulation may benefit patients’ quality of life, independently from initial response, thus paving the way to recovery 10. After the acute phase of treatment for a first psychotic episode, guidelines usually indicate that subsequent maintenance antipsychotic medication should continue for at least 1 year, but consensus is lacking regarding the total duration of treatment if the patient remains asymptomatic1,11. A 5-year observational study of patients with first-episode psychosis indicated that stopping antipsychotic medication increased relapse rates 5-fold compared with continued treatment12. Annual discontinuation rates for oral antipsychotics in first-episode schizophrenia were as high as 42% in the European First Episode Schizophrenia Trial (EUFEST)13. However, the risk of relapse needs to be weighed against the likelihood and severity of adverse effects caused by antipsychotic medication14 and the fact that about 20% of first-episode patients experience only a single episode of psychosis15. The commonest cause of relapse and hospitalization in schizophrenia is poor adherence to oral medication16.
The issue of the lack of adherence to antipsychotic medication
Non-adherence to medication is a major challenge for patients treated for schizophrenia; adherence problems are among the most frequent causes of relapse and rehospitalization17,18. Despite the availability of effective antipsychotic treatment, adherence to antipsychotic treatment in the long run is low13,19. Failure to comply with treatment is frequent in patients with schizophrenia. Between ½ to ¾ of patients do not comply with prescription13,20. Some non-adherence is not due to willful refusal to take medication21, but rather to patient forgetfulness, which can worsen by illness sequelae, such as disorganization or lack of insight. Cannabis use is a risk factor for non-adherence to medication and dropout from treatment22. It should be recalled that schizophrenia and cannabis abuse frequently co-exist, but the causality of their relationship is far from clear23. In addition, stigma can also play a role, as can adverse effects, cost and lack of perceived efficacy21. Also, given that adherence may decrease in 25-80% of patients during treatment24, non-adherence could substantially impact healthcare costs, an issue that still awaits accurate evaluation25.
Health Economics aspects
Epidemiological data show mental illness to occur both in more- and in less-economically developed countries26. Mental disorders are known to have major consequences for longevity, quality of life, and productivity for both patients and caregiver. Mental health disorders are inversely correlated with household income27; this might indicate that mental illness negatively affects patients’ and their families productivity or, as some authors discussed28, that a low socio-economic status increases the risk of mental health problems. Schizophrenia, the most chronic and disabling of major mental illnesses, is included among the first ten causes worldwide of long-term disability, with a wide ranging and long-lasting impact for people suffering from the illness, their families and society as a whole29-31. In the USA, its direct and indirect costs are estimated to amount to $ 62,700,000,00032. Similarly, in Europe the total cost related to schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders was estimated at € 93,900,000,000; 69% of this amount is due to indirect costs33. Direct and indirect costs are high because schizophrenia is a chronic, lifelong condition with frequent relapses after onset, that occurs most frequently in young age34,35. In terms of direct costs, their main drivers in Italy were estimated to be hospitalization and residential cost (71% of total direct cost per patient), followed by semi-residential services (13%), antipsychotic and other drugs (8%) and outpatient services (8%)29,36,37. Despite the availability of effective antipsychotic drugs for the treatment of acute and chronic treatment of schizophrenia, more than 80% of patients relapse within 5 years, and suicide occurs in about 10% of cases38,39. Increased relapse during the post-onset period (16% in the first year after diagnosis, 50% at 2 years and 70% at 5 years39,40) means, in clinical and management terms, high hospitalization rates and, in economic terms, increased costs per treated individual. The most common cause of relapse in treated schizophrenia is poor adherence to oral medication41,42. Non-adherence contributes to a substantial increase in the cost of schizophrenia43-45. It is estimated that non-adherence accounts for approximately 40% of re-hospitalization costs for patients with schizophrenia in the 2 years following their discharge from an inpatient treatment facility46. Consequently, efficacious interventions and a correct integrated management of schizophrenia patients are essential to increase adherence, prevent relapse, and restore social functioning, so to improve long-term prognosis and reduce costs.
Early treatment with Long Acting Injectable (LAI) antipsychotics represents an effective tool for improving adherence39,47 and should have a positive economic impact reducing the main important direct cost of the total economic burden of disease (hospitalization). For example, if an efficacious treatment with fair adherence reduces by only 5% re-hospitalization, the estimated mean cost reduction per patient in Italy would be € 146 per year36 that multiplied for approximately 180.000 patients treated48,49 would correspond to a total direct cost reduction of € 26.2 million per year. In Italy, it was estimated that the most important costs related to schizophrenia are indirect and correspond to 70% of the total economic burden per patient50. Unemployment rate in schizophrenia is more than double than the one in the general population51,52 and 51% of these subjects obtain a disability pension in Italy51. Indirect costs represents the key economic aspects in the management of schizophrenia patients. In fact, another important objective of pharmacological intervention in the stable phase of the disease is to prevent relapse and help keeping the patient stable enough to ensure a life as normal as possible; this would allow to continue to promote the process of recovery34,35. This would translate into reduced absenteeism and for patients with a job and increase the possibility to find a job for those who are unemployed.
Efficacy, adherence and good management are important not only from a clinical perspective, but also for their economic impact. A new treatment approach would change the cost structure of schizophrenia by decreasing costs (especially in terms of hospitalization and indirect costs) with efficient economic resource allocation guaranteed from efficient diagnostic and therapeutic pathways.
We searched the PubMed database using the following search strategy “(antipsychotic* OR neuroleptic*) AND (long-acting OR depot OR LAI OR once monthly OR prolonged release) AND (“randomized controlled trial*” OR double-blind)”. Reference lists of identified articles were reviewed for additional relevant publications. Included were double-blind, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of any LAI antipsychotic versus placebo or comparators.
Our search strategy yielded 271 records on April 6, 2016; of these, 30 were reviews and excluded, but their reference lists were hand-searched for the identification of other potential studies to include. We finally included in our discussion of the efficacy and safety of LAIs 16 studies that are cited in that section. Table 1 roughly summarizes the evidence obtained from these studies. No other papers emerged after having searched the reference lists of retrieved literature. For a thorough review we recommend the paper by Graffino et al. 53.

Strategies to prevent relapses and to reduce hospitalization by improving medication adherence
Relapse prevention is critical, as psychopathology and social functioning can worsen with psychotic episodes in schizophrenia54. Guidelines for the management of schizophrenia recommend improving medication adherence as a strategy to reduce hospitalization rates and costs in patients with schizophrenia55. Long-acting injectable anti-psychotics provide an opportunity to improve medication adherence21,56,57 and reduce hospitalization rates compared to treatment with oral formulations. Relapse prevention and identifying treatments to assist patients may reduce the risk of cognitive and functional declines across the lifespan in patients with schizophrenia.
The issue of recovery in schizophrenia: is it feasible in studies of recently introduced antipsychotics?
It is widely accepted that some patients with schizophrenia may have a favorable prognosis. Symptoms can abate over time, and some patients with schizophrenia may attain fair outcomes in some clinical and functioning outcomes. While remission is usually well defined in terms of clinical symptoms58, recovery involves also regaining the pre-onset functioning in the social interaction, physical activity/independence (autonomy), leisure and work domains. The benefits of an early intervention program for psychosis support higher recovery rates at substantially lower personal and economic costs59-61. Extensive scientific literature supports the clinical benefits of antipsychotics for early intervention or treatment of first-episode psychosis62. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis found that second-generation LAIs were superior to first-generation LAIs for relapse prevention63. In addition, LAIs are effective for treating first-episode psychosis and for early initiation of treatment for schizophrenia64.
We intend to propose a scientific evidence/guideline-based model that provides an algorithm for standard treatment, rehabilitation and recovery investigating the efficacy and safety of antipsychotics LAI in treatment, maintenance, relapse prevention and recovery in schizophrenia.
Efficacy and safety of atypical LAI antipsychotics
Some investigations showed significant reductions in recurrence rates with the risperidone LAI formulation compared to the oral one65-67, while others failed to confirm this superiority68,69. The efficacy and tolerability of olanzapine LAI (olanzapine pamoate) was assessed in two randomized, double-blind, controlled trials, one compared to placebo70, the other to oral olanzapine71. In the placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial72, olanzapine LAI improved the level of functioning in acutely ill patients with schizophrenia after 8-weeks. In a recent 2-year, open-label, randomized study of olanzapine LAI, outpatients with schizophrenia maintained or improved their baseline level of functioning over time, but results did not significantly differ between olanzapine LAI and oral olanzapine73. Several studies have demonstrated the greater efficacy of paliperidone LAI (paliperidone palmitate) compared to placebo and its non-inferiority compared to risperidone LAI in improving the PANSS scores in schizophrenia patients with acute symptomatology and in inducing a delay in time to recurrence in stabilized patients74. Paliperidone LAI has a relatively neutral metabolic profile, resulting in only limited weight gain and no effects on glucose and lipid metabolism, both in short and long-term studies75. More recently, the LAI formulation of aripiprazole has been approved by EMA for the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia in adult patients stabilized with oral aripiprazole76. Found aripiprazole LAI to be not inferior to its oral counterpart, while a further study, carried-out in Asian countries established that the two formulations were comparably well tolerated77. The clinical efficacy of aripiprazole LAI was established in two randomized, double-blind, controlled studies conducted in patients with schizophrenia in an acute78 and in a maintenance setting79. The efficacy and safety of aripiprazole LAI in the maintenance of stabilized schizophrenia were comparable to those of oral aripiprazole79. Aripiprazole LAI was also found to be efficacious and safe for patients experiencing an acute schizophrenia episode78. Superior improvements on clinician-rated health-related quality of life and a favorable tolerability profile suggest greater overall effectiveness for aripiprazole vs. PP80. Pharmacological (dynamic/kinetic) and dosage-related measures of LAI antipsychotic drugs are compared in Table 2.

Schizophrenia is a chronic and disabling condition that requires long-term pharmacological and nonpharmacological management. This is multidimensional and can involve integrated psychosocial interventions, including family therapy and individual psychotherapy, social interventions like case management and psychosocial support, professional rehabilitation, establishing a network of social relations and motivation to engage in pleasurable activities. This may require a team working in harmony with the same aim, i.e., to benefit the patient and increase his/her quality of life.
Efficacy, adherence and good management are important not only from a clinical perspective, but also for their economic impact. A new treatment approach would change the cost structure of schizophrenia by decreasing costs (especially in terms of hospitalization and indirect costs) with efficient economic resource allocation guaranteed from efficient diagnostic and therapeutic pathways.
Integrated care pathways (PDTA) and management models (Mo.Ma) are government tools that can enhance the different actors to define the best pathway for the schizophrenia patients optimizing clinical and the healthcare outcomes and resources.
In mental health and schizophrenia disease these aspects are particularly important due to the complexity of the diagnosis, treatment and case management. The complexity of the diagnosis is related to the presence of a variety of signs and symptoms, the treatment needs to be coordinated between the clinical and psychosocial aspects, and lastly the case management requires to structure processes in which different actors take part (various specialties, professions and hospital-territory).
The clinical pathway reported in Fig. 1 has been recently proposed to summarize current Guidelines and optimize resources and costs81. Our proposed model focuses on the right part of the algorithm, marked as Mo.Ma intervention area and will be detailed further on.

Current treatment clinical practice
In the current treatment practice, after being prescribed an oral, classical or atypical antipsychotic, the patient is initially monitored for response and has his/her treatment adjusted according to needs. Once efficacy has been established, the patient is usually monitored for side effects that may be subtle and insidious in onset, such as dysmetabolism and weight gain. Side effects, like suboptimal efficacy, are likely to be associated with subsequent development of non-adherence, hence the switch to another oral antipsychotic should include the possibility to consider switching to a LAI formulation (classical/atypical). During the course of schizophrenia, which may be exacerbating and remitting even in the face of previously effective drug treatment, hospitalization is always an option. While in the hospital adherence is easier to assess, problems arise as soon as the patient is discharged when he/she should be taken care by his/her reference community service and followed-up for adherence. It is not uncommon in this phase to switch from an oral to an atypical antipsychotic LAI formulation to ensure adherence, which in turn is related to better outcomes. The same considerations of the post-first episode discharge hold true even for the post-discharge period of subsequent episodes of schizophrenia. However, with repeated episodes, the likelihood to deal with people needing first generation LAI antipsychotics or hyperprolactinising atypical LAI antipsychotics increases, thus reducing the possibility to benefit from the better quality of life associated with the use of aripiprazole LAI (Figure 2).

Mo.Ma evidence-based model algorithm for standard treatment, rehabilitation and recovery
People with schizophrenia face a number of challenges in managing their lives and disease, including lack of insight into their illness and cognitive deficits that interfere with treatment adherence – both psychosocial and pharmacologic. These challenges increase the risk of relapse, with each relapse resulting in significant personal and economic costs.
A wide variety of antipsychotic agents is available, with the drugs having broadly similar efficacies in terms of producing reductions in symptoms and in the risk of relapse. Therefore, antipsychotic choice is commonly guided by tolerability issues and individual patient factors, including past medical history, past response to drugs, past experience of adverse events, concurrent medical conditions or comorbidities, and individual patient preference. However, their success depends also on treatment adherence. The use of atypical LAI formulations of antipsychotic drugs is suitable to overcome medication non-adherence. Relapse prevention is considered a major treatment aim in schizophrenia. Relapse itself represents an important predictor of subsequent relapse, while multiple relapses have been associated with poorer long-term outcome 13. Relapse rates decrease by over 50% after maintenance antipsychotic treatment78. Three RCTs support relapse prevention by LAI aripiprazole in schizophrenia, two versus oral76,77 and one versus placebo79. The latter has also shown efficacy in the acute treatment of schizophrenia78. Psychiatric hospitalization rates were significantly lower when patients were treated with aripiprazole LAI, compared with oral anti-psychotic therapy82. In a head-to-head comparison study80, treatment with aripiprazole LAI showed superior improvements to paliperidone palmitate (PP) on health-related quality of life, improvements in symptoms and functioning, and a favorable tolerability profile, as shown by fewer important AEs and lower all-cause discontinuation rates; taken together, these data suggest greater overall effectiveness for aripiprazole LAI vs. paliperidone palmitate. In predefined analyses, significantly greater improvements with aripiprazole LAI vs. PP were consistently shown in patients ≤35 years, indicating that younger patients may be particularly responsive to aripiprazole LAI. aripiprazole LAI may show a favorable metabolic profile and was generally well tolerated. Of 12 analyzable drugs, aripiprazole ranked fourth for limiting weight gain and fifth for limiting EPS and sedation, best for limiting prolactin increase and prolactin levels, and second best drug for limiting QTc prolongation83. The better tolerability profile of aripiprazole regarding metabolic alterations and prolactin increase suggests that aripiprazole LAI may target those patients for which these issues are a particular concern. The safety profile of aripiprazole LAI was comparable to that of oral aripiprazole76,77 and consistent with the one reported for oral aripiprazole in previous registration maintenance studies84,85.
Studies confirm that aripiprazole LAI choice is reasonable for younger, first episode patients, who showed more benefit than multi episode patients with schizophrenia80. Patients with obesity are also likely to benefit more from aripiprazole LAI86. For patients with a chronic disorder that had previously responded to other antipsychotics and who have florid positive symptoms, other LAIs may be preferable.
We are tempted to conclude that the sooner you intervene, the better (Figure 3). So we propose a model that integrates all current notions about schizophrenia, its insidious onset and prodrome, the worsening course in the absence of timely treatment, and the negative impact of hospitalizations and nonadherence, we call this Mo.Ma (Model of Management). The model in current psychiatric practice may be implemented according to the algorithm found in Figure 2. Considering both clinical and pharmacoeconomic aspects 82,87 we here propose this updated treatment algorithm, by which the choice of a LAI antipsychotic may occur soon after diagnosis of schizophrenia, especially for patients with poor awareness of illness and poor insight; this algorithm will allow us to deal with patients from the very first presentation of psychosis to full-blown schizophrenia. LAIs are traditionally reserved for patients at later stages of psychosis; however their use is currently advocated for early episodes of schizophrenia, so to further improve outcomes like recurrence, hospitalization rate, and consequences of lack or less than optimal treatment 88,89.
The above model is already in place in the Mental Health centers of the scientific board of this article, but in order to be validated it needs to be tested against current practices to determine its validity in other centers. Possible study designs could compare outcomes of LAIs vs. their respective oral medications, LAIs vs. other LAIs and/or placebo in LAI-like formulation, or the algorithms in Figure 2 vs. Figure 3. The results of a similar study will tell us whether there is a need for change in our current practices. Outcomes should include efficacy and safety matters, but also patient-focused measures such as quality of life, functioning, satisfaction with treatment and attitudes towards the use of drugs.
A set of indicators (KPI) can be selected to validate organization quality and process, so to monitor the correct adoption of clinical pathways (Figure 4)90.
Applying the model we propose is desirable to obtain:
• Reducing hospitalizations by increasing adherence
• Reduction medication dosages
• Improve compliance to other drugs
• Increase subjective well-being
• Improve social functioning (recovery)
• Reducing health care costs
• Reducing Social costs

Since this was a selective, nonsystematic review, we might have not included in our discussion some significant papers. Furthermore, since we endorse a strong, ground-breaking viewpoint, we might not concord with the bulk of literature; however, we identified some papers that are in line with this viewpoint, so this paper may be added to theirs and constitute the core of a new approach to the early treatment of schizophrenia.
Schizophrenia affects approximately 1% of the population, and is a severe mental illness with a chronic impact on social and occupational functioning and daily activities. Schizophrenia, is the most chronic and disabling of mental illnesses and is included among the first ten causes worldwide of long-term disability, with a wide ranging and long-lasting impact for people suffering from the illness, their families and society as a whole29-31.
The primary goals in the management of schizophrenia are directed not only at symptom reduction in the short and long term, but also at maintaining physical and mental functioning, improving quality of life, and promoting patient recovery57,91.
Efficacious interventions and a correct integrated management of schizophrenia patients are essential to increase adherence, prevent relapse, and restore social functioning, so to improve long-term prognosis and reduce costs. Early treatment with LAI antipsychotics represents an effective tool for improving adherence39,47 and should have a positive economic impact reducing the main important direct cost of the total economic burden of disease (hospitalization).
The proposed schizophrenia model of management, already in place in the Mental department of the board members, allowed better patient management and recovery, where aripiprazole LAI formulation represents a new safe and effective long-acting treatment option for the management of schizophrenia. The efficacy of aripiprazole LAI as maintenance treatment for schizophrenia has been demonstrated in three RCTs. Aripiprazole LAI was superior to placebo, and non-inferior to oral aripiprazole, in delaying the time to (impending) relapse, as well as in reducing relapse rates. The actual benefit of aripiprazole LAI over oral medications in clinical practice may even be greater than the one shown in RCTs, since patient willingness to participate and a protected research environment can increase treatment adherence. Since patients seen in everyday practice are likely to show poor adherence, the increased compliance fostered by LAI formulations will probably increase the gap between LAI and oral aripiprazole.
In the model of management we propose, the cost structure of schizophrenia could also change by decreasing costs with efficient economic resource allocation guaranteed from efficient diagnostic and therapeutic pathways. The cost-saving effect of aripiprazole LAI compared to other antipsychotics has to be investigated in a real life setting; however, data emerging from recent publications and congress abstracts suggest that the use of aripiprazole LAI will lower health care costs more than other antipsychotics and other LAI at least compared to paliperidone palmitate.

Acknowledgments: The authors wish to thank Ms Mimma Ariano, Ms Ales Casciaro, Ms Teresa Prioreschi, and Ms Susanna Rospo, Librarians of the Sant’Andrea Hospital, School of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University, Rome, for rendering precious bibliographical material accessible, as well as their Secretary Lucilla Martinelli for her assistance during the writing of the manuscript.

Financial & Competing Interests Disclosure: In the past three years, Paolo Girardi has received research support from Lilly, Janssen, Angelini, and Springer Healthcare, and has participated in Advisory Boards for Lilly, Otsuka, Pfizer, Schering, and Springer Healthcare and received honoraria from Lilly and Springer Healthcare. All other authors of this paper have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in, or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.
 1. National Institute of Mental Health. Numbers count: mental disorders in America. 2013.
 2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association, 2013.
 3. Auslander LA, Lindamer LL, Delapena J, et al. A comparison of community-dwelling older schizophrenia patients by residential status. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2001; 103: 380-6.
 4. Bowie CR, Reichenberg A, Patterson TL, Heaton RK, Harvey PD. Determinants of real-world functional performance in schizophrenia subjects: correlations with cognition, functional capacity, and symptoms. Am J Psychiatry 2006; 163: 418-25.
 5. Liberman RP, Kopelowicz A, Ventura J, Gutkind D. Operational criteria and factors related to recovery from schizophrenia. Int Rev Psychiatr 2002; 14: 256-72.
 6. Lieberman JA, Perkins D, Belger A, et al. The early stages of schizophrenia: speculations on pathogenesis, pathophysiology, and therapeutic approaches. Biol Psychiatry 2001; 50: 884-97. Erratum in: Biol Psychiatry 2002; 51: 346.
 7. Harvey PD, Green MF, Keefe RSE, Velligan DI. Cognitive functioning in schizophrenia: a consensus statement on its role in the definition and evaluation of effective treatments for the illness. J Clin Psychiatry 2004; 65: 361-72.
 8. Wiersma D, Wanderling J, Dragomirecka E, et al. Social disability in schizophrenia: its development and prediction over 15 years in incidence cohorts in six European centres. Psychol Med 2000; 30: 1155-67.
 9. Turner N, Browne S, Clarke M, et al. Employment status amongst those with psychosis at first presentation. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2009; 44: 863-9.
10. Pietrini F, Spadafora M, Talamba GA, et al. The effects of switching from oral to LAI antipsychotic treatment on subjective experience of schizophrenic and schizoaffective patients: Preliminary results. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract 2015; 19: 106-13.
11. Buchanan RW, Kreyenbuhl J, Kelly DL, et al. Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT): the 2009 schizophrenia PORT psychopharmacological treatment recommendations and summary statements. Schizophr Bull 2010; 36: 71-93.
12. Robinson D, Woerner MG, Alvir JM, et al. Predictors of relapse following response from a first episode of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999; 56: 241-7.
13. Kahn RS, Fleischhacker WW, Boter H, et al. Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in first-episode schizophrenia and schizophreniform disorder: an open randomised clinical trial. Lancet 2008; 371: 1085-97.
14. Haddad PM, Sharma SG. Adverse effects of atypical antipsychotics: differential risk and clinical implications. CNS Drugs 2007; 21: 911-36.
15. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Schizophrenia: Core Interventions in the Treatment and Management of Schizophrenia in Adults in Primary and Secondary Care (Update), Final Version (NICE Clinical Guideline 82). London, NICE, March 2009 (
16. Lindenmayer JP, Liu-Seifert H, Kulkarni PM, et al. Medication nonadherence and treatment outcome in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder with suboptimal prior response. J Clin Psychiatry 2009; 70: 990-6.
17. Keith S, Kane JM. Partial Compliance and patient consequences in schizophrenia: our patients can do better. J Clin Psych 2003; 64: 1308-15.
18. Kane JM. Improving treatment adherence in patients with schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry 2011; 72: e28.
19. Mullins CD, Obeidat NA, Cuffel BJ, Naradzay J, Loebel AD. Risk of discontinuation of atypical antipsychotic agents in the treatment of schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2008; 98: 8-15.
20. Byerly MJ, Nakonezny PA, Lescouflair E. Antipsychotic medication adherence in schizophrenia. Psychiatric Clin North Am 2007; 30: 437-52.
21. Velligan DI, Weiden PJ, Sajatovic M, et al. The expert consensus guideline series: adherence problems in patients with serious and persistent mental illness. J Clin Psychiatry 2009; 70 Suppl 4: 1-46; quiz 47-8.
22. Miller R, Ream G, McCormack J, Gunduz-Bruce H, Sevy S, Robinson D. A prospective study of cannabis use as a risk factor for non-adherence and treatment dropout in first-episode schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2009; 113: 138-44.
23. Bersani G, Orlandi V, Kotzalidis GD, Pancheri P. Cannabis and schizophrenia: impact on onset, course, psychopathology and outcomes. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2002; 252: 86-92.
24. Conley R, Kelly D. Management of treatment resistance in schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry 2001; 50: 898-911.
25. Hughes DA, Bagust A, Haycox A, Walley T. Accounting for noncompliance in pharmacoeconomic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics 2001; 19: 1185-97.
26. Demyttenaere K, Bruffaerts R, Posada-Villa J, et al. Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. JAMA 2004; 291: 2581-90.
27. Golberstein E, Busch SH. Mental Health, Determinants of. In: Culyer A (ed). Encyclopedia of Health Economics. United States: Elsevier, 2014.
28. Yeo RA, Martinez D, Pommy J, et al. The impact of parent socio-economic status on executive functioning and cortical morphology in individuals with schizophrenia and healthy controls. Psychol Med 2014; 44: 1257-65.
29. Cortesi PA, Mencacci C, Luigi F, et al. Compliance, persistence, costs and quality of life in young patients treated with antipsychotic drugs: results from the COMETA study. BMC Psychiatry 2013; 13: 98.
30. Rössler W, Salize HJ, van Os J, Riecher-Rössler A. Size of burden of schizophrenia and psychotic disorders. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2005; 15: 399-409.
31. Knapp M, Mangalore R, Simon J. The global costs of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2004; 30: 279-93.
32. Wu EQ, Birnbaum HG, Shi L, et al. The economic burden of schizophrenia in the United States in 2002. J Clin Psychiatry 2005; 66: 1122-9.
33. Gustavsson A, Svensson M, Jacobi F, et al. Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2011; 21: 718-79.
34. Hasan A, Falkai P, Wobrock T, et al. World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Schizophrenia. Part 3: Update 2015 Management of special circumstances: Depression, Suicidality, substance use disorders and pregnancy and lactation. World J Biol Psychiatry 2015; 16: 142-70.
35. Hasan A, Falkai P, Wobrock T, et al. World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia, part 2: update 2012 on the long-term treatment of schizophrenia and management of antipsychotic-induced side effects. World J Biol Psychiatry 2013; 14: 2-44.
36. Degli Esposti L, Sangiorgi D, Mencacci C, et al. Pharmaco-utilisation and related costs of drugs used to treat schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in Italy: the IBIS study. BMC Psychiatry 2014; 14: 282.
37. Ravasio R, Sanfilippo L, De Paoli G, Cerra C, Fratino P, Della Giovanna M. I costi della schizofrenia in Italia: i risultati di un’analisi condotta nell’ASL della Provincia di Pavia. Giornale Italiano di Health Technology Assessment 2009; 2: 19-28.
38. Leucht S, Tardy M, Komossa K, et al. Antipsychotic drugs versus placebo for relapse prevention in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2012; 379: 2063-71.
39. Patel MX, Taylor M, David AS. Antipsychotic long-acting injections: mind the gap. Br J Psychiatry 2009; 195 (suppl 52): S1-4.
40. Robinson D, Woerner MG, Alvir JM, et al. Predictors of relapse following response from a first episode of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999; 56: 241-7.
41. Kaplan G, Casoy J, Zummo J. Impact of long-acting injectable antipsychotics on medication adherence and clinical, functional, and economic outcomes of schizophrenia. Patient Prefer Adherence 2013; 7: 1171-80.
42. Lindenmayer JP, Liu-Seifert H, Kulkarni PM, et al. Medication nonadherence and treatment outcome in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder with suboptimal prior response. J Clin Psychiatry 2009; 70: 990-6.
43. Svarstad BL, Shireman TI, Sweeney JK. Using drug claims data to assess the relationship of medication adherence with hospitalization and costs. Psychiatr Serv 2001; 52: 805-11.
44. Thieda P, Beard S, Richter A, Kane J. An economic review of compliance with medication therapy in the treatment of schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv 2003; 54: 508-16.
45. Knapp M, King D, Pugner K, Lapuerta P. Non-adherence to antipsychotic medication regimens: associations with resource use and costs. Br J Psychiatry 2004; 184: 509-16.
46. Weiden PJ, Olfson M. Cost of relapse in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1995; 21: 419-29.
47. Kane JM. Treatment strategies to prevent relapse and encourage remission. J Clin Psychiatry 2007; 68 Suppl 14: 27-30.
48. Faravelli C, Abrardi L, Bartolozzi D, et al. The Sesto Fiorentino study: point and one-year prevalences of psychiatric disorders in an Italian community sample using clinical interviewers. Psychother Psychosom 2004; 73: 226-34.
49. Gaddini A. MV, Arcà M., Fratini S. Rapporto sull’attività dei Centri di Salute Mentale, dei Centri Diurni e delle Strutture Residenziali psichiatriche del Lazio. ASP Regione Lazio, 2014.
50. Tarricone R, Gerzeli S, Montanelli R, et al. Direct and indirect costs of schizophrenia in community psychiatric services in Italy. The GISIES study. Interdisciplinary Study Group on the Economic Impact of Schizophrenia. Health Policy 2000; 51: 1-18.
51. Garattini L, Barbui C, Clemente R, et al. Direct costs of schizophrenia and related disorders in Italian community mental health services: a multicenter, prospective 1-year followup study. Schizophr Bull 2004; 30: 295-302.
52. Garattini L, Rossi C, Tediosi F, et al. Direct costs of schizophrenia in Italian community psychiatric services. Pharmacoeconomics 2001; 19: 1217-25.
53. Graffino M, Montemagni C, Mingrone C, et al. Long acting injectable antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia: a review of literature. Riv Psichiatr 2014; 49: 115-23.
54. Kane JM, Kishimoto T, Correll CU. Assessing the comparative effectiveness of long-acting injectable vs. oral antipsychotic medications in the prevention of relapse provides a case study in comparative effectiveness research in psychiatry. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66 (8 suppl): S37-41.
55. Leucht S, Tardy M, Komossa K, Heres S, Kissling W, Davis JM. Maintenance treatment with antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 5: CD008016.
56. Kahn RS, Keefe RS. Schizophrenia is a cognitive illness: time for a change in focus. JAMA Psychiatry 2013; 70: 1107-12.
57. Hasan A, Falkai P, Wobrock T, et al. World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia, part 2: update 2012 on the long-term treatment of schizophrenia and management of antipsychotic-induced side effects. World J Biol Psychiatry 2013; 14: 2-44.
58. Leucht S, Lasser R. The concepts of remission and recovery in schizophrenia. Pharmacopsychiatry 2006; 39: 161-70.
59. Mihalopoulos C, Harris M, Henry L, Harrigan S, McGorry P. Is early intervention in psychosis cost-effective over the long term? Schizophr Bull 2009; 35: 909-18.
60. Serretti A, Mandelli L, Bajo E, et al. The socio-economical burden of schizophrenia: a simulation of cost-offset of early intervention program in Italy. Eur Psychiatry 2009; 24: 11-6.
61. Cocchi A, Mapelli V, Meneghelli A, Preti A. Cost-effectiveness of treating first-episode psychosis: five-year follow-up results from an Italian early intervention programme. Early Interv Psychiatry 2011; 5: 203-11.
62. Marshall M, Rathbone J. Early intervention for psychosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (6): CD004718.
63. Kishimoto T, Agarwal V, Kishi T, Leucht S, Kane JM, Correll CU. Relapse prevention in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of second-generation antipsychotics versus first-generation antipsychotics. Mol Psychiatry 2013; 18: 53-66.
64. Stevens GL, Dawson G, Zummo J. Clinical benefits and impact of early use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics for schizophrenia. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2015 Sep 25. doi: 10.1111/eip.12278.
65. Leucht C, Heres S, Kane JM, Kissling W, Davis JM, Leucht S. Oral versus depot antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia–a critical systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised long-term trials. Schizophr Res 2011; 127: 83-92.
66. Grimaldi-Bensouda L, Rouillon F, Astruc B, et al. Does long-acting injectable risperidone make a difference to the real life treatment of schizophrenia? Results of the Cohort for the General Study of Schizophrenia (CGS). Schizophr Res 2012; 134: 187-94.
67. Lambert T, Emmerson B, Hustig H, et al.; e-STAR ResearchGroup. Long-acting risperidone in Australian patients with chronic schizophrenia: 24-month data from the e-STAR database. BMC Psychiatry 2012; 26: 12-25.
68. Buckley PF, Schooler NR, Goff DC, et al.; the PROACTIVE Study. Comparison of SGA Oral Medications and a Long-Acting Injectable SGA: the PROACTIVE Study. Schizophr Bull 2015; 41: 449-59.
69. Barnett PG, Scott JY, Krystal JH, et al.; CSP 555 Research Group. Cost and cost-effectiveness in a randomized trial of long-acting risperidone for schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry 2012; 73: 696-702.
70. Lauriello J, Lambert T, Andersen S, et al. An 8-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of olanzapine long- acting injection in acutely ill patients with schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry 2008; 69: 790-9.
71. Kane JM, Detke HC, Naber D, et al. Olanzapine long-acting injection: a 24-week, randomized, double-blind trial of maintenance treatment in patients with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2010; 167: 181-9.
72. Witte MM, Case MG, Schuh KJ, et al. Effects of olanzapine long-acting injection on levels of functioning among acutely ill patients with schizophrenia. Curr Med Res Opin 2012; 28: 315-23.
73. Ascher-Svanum H, Novick D, Haro JM, et al. Long-term functional improvements in the 2-year treatment of schizophrenia outpatients with olanzapine long-acting injection. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2014; 10: 1125-31.
74. Fu DJ, Bossie CA, Sliwa JK, et al. Paliperidone palmitate versus oral risperidone and risperidone long-acting injection in patients with recently diagnosed schizophrenia: a tolerability and efficacy comparison. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2014; 29: 45-55.
75. Gilday E, Nasrallah HA. Clinical pharmacology of paliperidone palmitate, a parenteral long-acting formulation for the treatment of schizophrenia. Rev Recent Clin Trials 2012; 7: 2-9.
76. Fleischhacker WW, Sanchez R, Perry PP, et al. Aripiprazole once-monthly for treatment of schizophrenia: double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority study. Br J Psychiatry 2014; 205: 135-44.
77. Ishigooka J, Nakamura J, Fujii Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of aripiprazole once-monthly in Asian patients with schizophrenia: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study versus oral aripiprazole. Schizophr Res 2015; 161: 421-8.
78. Kane JM, Peters-Strickland T, Baker RA, et al. Aripiprazole once-monthly in the acute treatment of schizophrenia: findings from a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry 2014; 75: 1254-60.
79. Kane JM, Sanchez R, Perry PP, et al. Aripiprazole intramuscular depot as maintenance treatment in patients with schizophrenia: a 52-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry 2012; 73: 617-24.
80. Naber D, Hansen K, Forray C, et al. Qualify: a randomized head-to-head study of aripiprazole once-monthly and paliperidone palmitate in the treatment of schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2015; 168: 498-504.
81. Colombo GL, Valentino MC, Di Matteo S, Bruno GM. Il percorso diagnostico terapeutico assistenziale nella schizofrenia. Poster presentato al 47° Congresso Nazionale della Società Italiana di Psichiatria (SIP), Giardini Naxos, Taormina, Catania, 11-15 ottobre 2015.
82. Kane JM, Sanchez R, Baker RA, et al. Patient-centered outcomes with aripiprazole once-monthly for maintenance treatment in patients with schizophrenia: results from two multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies. Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses 2015; 9: 79-87.
83. Leucht S, Cipriani A, Spineli L, et al. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 15 antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis. Lancet 2013; 382: 951-62.
84. Pigott TA, Carson WH, Saha AR, et al. Aripiprazole for the prevention of relapse in stabilized patients with chronic schizophrenia: a placebo-controlled 26-week study. J Clin Psychiatry 2003; 64: 1048-56.
85. Kasper S, Lerman MN, McQuade RD, et al. Efficacy and safety of aripiprazole vs. haloperidol for long-term maintenance treatment following acute relapse of schizophrenia. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2003; 6: 325-37.
86. De Hert M, Eramo A, Landsberg W, Kostic D, Tsai LF, Baker RA. Efficacy and safety of aripiprazole once-monthly in obese and nonobese patients with schizophrenia: a post hoc analysis. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2015; 11: 1299-306.
87. Citrome L. Aripiprazole long-acting injectable formulations for schizophrenia: aripiprazole monohydrate and aripiprazole lauroxil. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2016; 9: 169-86.
88. Stip E, Abdel-Baki A, Bloom D, Grignon S, Roy MA. Les antipsychotiques injectables à action prolongée: avis d’experts de l’Association des médecins psychiatres du Québec. [Long-acting injectable antipsychotics: an expert opinion from the Association des médecins psychiatres du Québec]. Can J Psychiatry. 2011; 56: 367-76.
89. Lachaine J, Lapierre ME, Abdalla N, Rouleau A, Stip E. Impact of switching to long-acting injectable antipsychotics on health services use in the treatment of schizophrenia. Can J Psychiatry 2015; 60 (3 suppl 2): S40-7.
90. Conferenza delle regioni e delle province autonome 14/131/cr08b/c8. Proposta di accordo Stato-Regioni sulla definizione dei percorsi di cura da attivare nei dipartimenti di salute mentale per i disturbi schizofrenici, i disturbi dell’umore e i disturbi gravi di personalità.
91. Maone A, D’Avanzo B. Recovery. Nuovi paradigmi per la salute mentale. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore, 2015.